Clicky

X

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the State of Digital Newsletter
Join an elite group of marketers receiving the best content in their mailbox
* = required field
Daily Updates

SEO 2012 – Will Schema Be A Factor

6 January 2012 BY

This is a guest post by Bryant Dunivan. Bryant Dunivan has been doing search marketing since 1999, he specializes in on-page optimization, social media, and seo copywriting. He operates the All Things Search Group, a marketing firm that provides search marketing services as well as traditional PR and marketing.

Arguably, the biggest search-related release of 2011 was the schema.org (Schema) markup. For those not familiar, Schema is a collection of tags designed to help supplement the information that the search engine gives to a user on the Search Engine Result Page (SERP). On the SERP, the searcher gets a result similar to this, which is a non-microformat result:

The information included in this type of result is basic; Google gives you a title tag snippet (which they are increasingly composing themselves) and an excerpt from the webpage if Google deems that the site’s description is unhelpful to the user.

Contrast this with a SERP with microformat information listed:

What we have here is a Google search result with a rating out of 5 stars, tells the searcher what kind of review number this rating is based out of, and the total prep time needed to cook this recipe.

What is interesting about Schema in and of itself is that it is a multi search engine supported tagging system. Google, Bing, and Yahoo have all worked together on this language format and all support it. We should remind you, that for some users, Yahoo’s use of these is minimal, as Bing serves the results for Yahoo. I have read a lot of “what to do in 2012” type threads relating to what is coming down the line of SEO, and am quite amazed at the widespread belief that Schema will be a major part of the algorithm in 2012.

Schema’s Mission

Schema’s mission is an initiative to “improve the display of search results.” This is meant to give Google, specifically, a better chance at providing the user the answer to their question before even clicking on their result. This in theory is quite good, as a searcher can pick items on the search based on criteria that may have not been present. If I do a search for [bread pudding], Google gives me three recipe results. As a normal searcher, if I am looking for a recipe, I do not want a two star bread pudding on my desert table. I would want the best bread pudding I can find. The stars for each recipe do just that, but it is not perfect: a four star criterion gets a rating out of five stars on the SERP. What Google specifically is doing here with schema is highlighting other content that would be useful to the user without forcing them to click and on each result.

Endorsement Woes

While it is tempting to jump on the Schema bandwagon, we must remember. This is not the first microformat markup. There was RDFa that, until the engines announced Schema, seemed to be the de facto leader of microformat markup. I have never seen RDFa define a SERP, and have not witnessed anything to decide placement to date. We are seeing a larger rollout with schema as a whole, there are a far greater number of Schema-augmented results in the past few months, but this is not solely because they are marked up with the Schema language. It also seems that valid RDFa markup are getting the benefit of this trend as well.

The fact that microformats have not been a part of the algorithm should be noted. Just because Schema has come out does not necessarily mean it will be part of the algorithm. Putting the same information in two ways on a site could be gamed by those who seek to manipulate the SERP and various algorithms out there. Viewing Google’s algorithm as a trend, I think that having Schema data is akin to having W3C compliant code – it make’s Google’s crawl of a site easier, but it is not a factor in determining a sites ranking on the SERP. The content that Schema seeks to highlight is already there on the page, with Schema being provide merely as a way to get this data on the SERP. It is hard to see the bots and crawler of each respective search engine “dumbing down” in order to focus on just Schema’s markup, so for the foreseeable future the typical non-Schema website it safe.

What if it becomes a Ranking Factor?

Schema in and of itself should bring an increase in traffic to those who deploy it, but the pressing question on everyone’s mind seems to be how will it affect ranking? This can go a few ways, but the most likely as of now would seem to be two fold.

For those interested in Bing/Yahoo (Bahoo), It could be an on-page factor, but Schema would bring some odd issues for their algorithm on its own. First, Bing uses impressions/click through ratio as a ranking factor. Schema poses a unique question for this type of ranking factor, as it could potentially cause an increase in impressions but decimate a once wonderful sites click through, especially for those on the mid level of the page. While some sites would see a great rise in the rankings, many high quality sites could feel the wrath of Bing if they implement schema as a ranking factor on its own. The more likely scenario would be to make schema a spam factor, much like the current implementation of the keyword tag. This could be a huge rank equalizer, as if a page content wise is on topic a, but schema properties say the site is on topic b, it could potentially show a spammy result.

Google is where things could potentially get interesting – the can augment the current algorithm to return more relevant results, but the question remains how they will implement it. Their implementation of Schema would be more involved – it would require a widespread implementation for it to be included. In the event that it is, it can become a ranking factor, but the impact would be minimal – much like the weight given to an h1 or h2 tag on the page. Schema will not define a page, but instead it will confirm the content and the value to the user.

The use of Schema that would make the most sense is to implement it in a form of vertical search. This would lend itself well to Google, as we know that they love having multiple verticle search results on a given SERP – in our example Google could also use Schema to create a dedicated recipe search, which Bing has already done to some extent.

Bottom Line

If your site would benefit from a better-looking description with more information on the SERP, go for it – Google has provided a nice verifier for your schema markup. If you are interested in Schema in only a ranking capability, it would be wise to hold off until we can see how widespread the adoption is of the standard, but it appears that Schema will not be a ranking factor in the near future.

AUTHORED BY:
h

This post was written by an author who is not a regular contributor to State of Digital. See all the other regular State of Digital authors here. Opinions expressed in the article are those of the contributor and not necessarily those of State of Digital.
  • Pingback: Fast, Easy Web Design! » Blog Archive » Exults Into the New Year and the Future of Internet Marketing as We Know It

  • Pingback: SearchCap: The Day In Search, January 6, 2012

  • Pingback: Affordable SEO System » SearchCap: The Day In Search, January 6, 2012

  • Pingback: Global Marketing Mix | SearchCap: The Day In Search, January 6, 2012

  • Pingback: SearchCap: The Day In Search, January 6, 2012 | Market 7

  • http://www.seopros.org Terry Van Horne

    Well there is RDFa I’m pretty sure that is what bestbuy used… there were a bunch of Rich Snippet videos released within the last month and definitely Google and supposedly other engines (yes they said that about nofollow too) prefer schemin’org. So yes unfortunately we’ll likely have to throw in the towel… but must also understand… this is a fcking Search Engine telling us how to build websites… Load speed becomes a factor and now this BS… just keep in mind who you are getting into bed with… we must remeber (not provided) and the fact that they can do whatever the fck they want once you got all your eggs in that basket… #JusSayin there is a track record

    • ninaom

      Well there is RDFa I’m pretty sure that is what bestbuy used… there were a bunch of Rich KEYWORD

      KEYWORD

      KEYWORD just keep in mind who you are getting into bed with

  • http://www.aprillins.org/ aprillins

    yes.. I consider microformats are future SEO because it really help user get the right content. Trust me it’s ranking factor. I’ve learnt about how it perform to help users using different type of microformats on the suitable contents (events, food, product reviews, and author pages).

    Microformats are slightly difficult to implement, thus need high effort to build it. Uneducated spammers, ordinary bloggers-spammers who want to get on top of Google with shit articles and bad quality links will not understand this so much because they’re to lazy something structured and have such complexity.. But, tech savvy people and passionate companies will get through it.

    that’s only in my opinion.. what about you?

  • Terry Van Horne

    apillins…. a ranking factor?…trust you? likely not! show me it’s a ranking factor…. a signal very likely a factor yes likely because Microformats change user behavior… yes it’s very complicated to isolate something like that…so to say is a factor …probably in that affects things we know POSITIVELY are ranking factors ie: PUSH ranks AKA Inbound links, document structure etc…

  • http://www.jonnyross.com Jonny Ross

    fairly sure its already a ranking factor on certain searches, makes sense, we all need to embrace it!

    @jrconsultancy

  • Bryant Dunivan

    @Terry – If it is up to google, they will have us implementing Schema. Unless it receives a mass adoption I do not see it becoming a ranking factor. It may help increase the coversion percentages based on rank (going from x percent to y percent because of schema data.) Not provided only affects logged in users, and while it sucks, it is the nature of the beast.

    @aprillins – User’s have been able to get the right content IMO without microformats, and if they are gamed then it might make the SERP even less valuable to users then it already is. If it is used correctly and becomes a factor we may see low ranking items (microdata wise) not shown on a SERP, but a lot of things have to happen for us to entertain that idea.

    @johnny – let’s see some examples? I have not encountered a page ranking higher because it has schema markup but if you have please share.

    Thank you all for reading this blog post, the response to it has been quite amazing.

  • http://www.languageconnect.net/ Talha

    Schema will become a factor and one of my tasks is to implement Schema tags onto the site that I manage.

    We have a very strong local SEO presence and to make the most out of it, we have planned on implementing Schema tags.

    Lets see how it goes.

  • Pingback: The Big List: 226 Marketing Trends, Predictions & Resolutions For 2012

  • Pingback: 2012 Marketing Trends, Predictions & Insights for online marketers.

  • Pingback: Ads As An SEO Factor: Oh No, Do I Have Too Many Ads? - Advertising, Google - State of Search

  • Pingback: Online Marketing Trends, Tips, Predictions & Resolutions for 2012 « Simon Phillips, Designer, SEO, Webguy | All things from the internet relating to design, SEO and the cosmos at large.

  • http://www.pagearabia.net/ الصفحة العربية

    thanks free match

  • Pingback: Seo Off Page « Duy Nguyen

  • Pingback: please click the next web page

Join our free webinar about blogging now!