Last week, I put together a workshop for Receptional Internet Marketing and sparked a very interesting debate: do Social Signals even affect page rank? Or is it a big Google-myth?
On one side of the table there were the more technical SEO guys who made some pretty compelling arguments favouring the opinion that Social Signals 100% do affect search rankings. On the other side, was the side of the table that felt that while Social Signals are important to the online marketing mix, Google hasn t explicitly said that they do yet.
I’ve read countless blogs on Social Signals, countless I say. Haven’t we all! So, while I am aware this may add to the mountain that is a Social Signal blog, hopefully I can shed some light onto the foggy on-going debate cloud hovering over this subject by splitting all the arguments I have come across into 3 parts:
Social Signals affect Page Rank within Google
Poor old Bing, it never gets a look in does it? Most arguments I have seen favouring this opinion centre around Google…as if anyone uses it *gawfaw*
Anyway, this argument has been corroborated by hundreds of top notch SEO professionals and all respect is due them; a few arguments against this stand point are:
Social Signals don’t affect Page Rank within Google
There are still many out there who take this stand point due to lack of confirmation from Google; studies have been, and are being, made as we speak . There are some brilliantly interesting results – some excessively complicated ones too. I ‘d urge everyone to check out Beyond’swhite paper on the Science of Google, Search and Social Signals by Judith Lewis for a great insight into Social Signals.
Many who choose this argument state that the effect Social Signals have on search results is only temporary – and they’d be right.
My recent SocialSafe review for example is still being Tweeted/Liked/whatever ed across cyberspace, therefore State of Search blog ranks on page 1 when I’m signed in or not, using a different browser or not:
Not to say that this won’t continue to get shared forever and ever, but when (if) it stops, it will be interesting to see what position it remains at on page 1.
Google are pushing us to create brilliant content and are rewarding us with a temporary push in search results – nevertheless it’s not consistent or predictable enough yet to prove this argument wrong. Sighs.
All of this is rubbish – Let’s get back to the basics
This is the argument I like the best.
What ARE Social Signals anyway? Let’s take Google & Bing out of the equation for a second and take it back to the old school. Surely a strong social signal is a post that did really well? Metrics such as ‘Number of Likes’ of a company page don’t mean a lot, it’s the content that really gets people’s attention. Because that’s that stuff that gets shared.
Shared stuff = stronger WoM + further brand reach = better trust signals + more interest in your products = more sales
The best maths I ever did, right there.
Add Google & Bing and other arguments into it and we are running the risk of missing the point of professional Social Media, which is this:
To build a bridge between your brand and your customer, which in turn ensures they and their friends build a stronger bridge back to yo.
For the sake of these 3 arguments, I propose a new way of explaining social signals. Why don’t we say that, as Digital Marketers, social signals are to good SEO what jam is to a Victoria sponge. You can t have one without the other, unless you want to be left with a pretty rubbish cake.
19 hours ago