Clicky

X

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the State of Digital Newsletter
Join an elite group of marketers receiving the best content in their mailbox
* = required field
Daily Updates

The Real Time Hype: take it or leave it?

11 March 2010 BY

0 Flares Twitter 0 Facebook 0 Google+ 0 LinkedIn 0 Buffer 0 Email 0 StumbleUpon 0 Pin It Share 0 Filament.io 0 Flares ×

Search is changing rapidly. Search Engines are looking at user intent and what users want. And speed is one thing which users want badly. Get information as fast as you possibly can. It doesn’t matter if its not accurate or if its ‘only’ written in 140 characters, as long as its fast.

The need for speed makes that new tools are developed which makes information go around the web, and with that the world, faster by the second. Status updates on Twitter and Facebook off course are the best examples of content going around the web in split seconds. A continuos conversation. But what can we do with that information? Do we really care?

It isn’t surprising that the major search engines took action on the need for speed. The deals which Twitter made with Bing, Yahoo and Google makes that we now find the tweets which we are all spreading across the web back in our search results. Google displays them as ‘real time results’. You can question how ‘real time’ these are and if they are really useful or not.

Google only displays real time results when it believes that they are relevant to the situation online (are there many tweets about a specific topic) and search. This means there are many topics on which the real time search results won’t show up. And why should they. When I’m doing research for a specific topic which has no relation to what is happening now, why should I want to see real time results for that? The need for real time results is there when realtime events ask for them.

When are the real time results useful? When it comes to specific events, like the death of Michael Jackson last year, yes, they could be very useful. On other occasions, like when you are doing research, its disputable. It turns out however that exactly when you’re doing research, you notice the real time results a little, but when you are looking to buy things, you miss out on the results. Weird huh? When you don’t need them you see them.

A recent usability study, performed by Oneupweb, reveals that most users overlook the real time results. They performed an eyetracking study comparing consumers and Information Foragers. Both groups largely ignored the real time results, with information foragers looking at and clicking on the results a bit more. But in general the real time results were ignored.

Some of the outcomes of the research (which you can find here) were:

  • The consumer group averaged 9 seconds to the first fixation on real-time results, whereas the information foragers took a full 14 seconds.
  • The consumer group had 10 percent fewer clicks on the real-time results
  • Only 55 percent of the participants could easily find the real-time results.

Take a look at some of the eye-tracking results:

So should we still care about the real time results?

Yes we should. The need for speed is still there. Apparently we want the realtime. But maybe people will be looking for those results in a different way. Maybe its not Google where we want them.

I was talking to someone this week who ‘admitted’ he still used ‘summize’ as a tool to filter out the tweets. Summize has been transformed to Twitter search already, but his confession shows an indication of how people will be looking at real time results: through vertical search engines like Leapfish, Oneriot and other similar engines.

When they are using those kind of services there are looking for real time results. Which means they won’t overlook them that fast.

LeapFish CEO and Founder Behnam Behrouzi thinks users will not use Google for active real-time search queries:

“There are 2 types of real time searches. One occurs passively, the second occurs when a user is actively looking for a real time search experience for a particular topic. The second type of real time search must be answered with a more multimedia experience that not only captures the piece of news occurring in real-time but also delivers the key imagery, video and opinions that users are looking for when actively performing a real-time search.”

This kind of information won’t be found in Google’s real time results, which will make those who want to know what is happening NOW not go to Google, but find their own specific real time search engine. And then its a whole different ball game. Searchengines like Leapfish, Oneriot, Twingly and even Bing, which has a specific Twitter search page, can take market share from Google…

AUTHORED BY:
h

Bas van den Beld is a speaker, trainer and online marketing strategist. Bas is the founder of Stateofdigital.com. -- You can hire Bas to speak, train or consult.
  • http://www.themediaflow.com Nichola Stott

    Bas,

    You’re timing on the post is impeccable. There’s a huge fire this morning, just east of the City of London. Twitter broke the story to me (of course). I think that for breaking news a traditional serp cannot compete with realtime media content providers, however (though it pains me to say this) Google do get this, and if I search on G UK for “fire tabernacle street” I get a pretty decent serp, with twitter, forum and online breaking news from 1-8 and a few lame results from about 8 onwards. Conversely Leapfish isn’t doing so well for me: http://www.leapfish.com/real.aspx?q=fire%20tabernacle%20street

    I get a “realtime results are slow at the moment” in the space where I suspect twitter should be. I’m not sure if this is a query load issue, or a Twitter integration issue, or some other teething trouble, but I’m willing to give specific realtime search engines the benefit of the doubt in the early stages.

    Things are getting pretty interesting in the search space again. If twitter could really sort their own search out, and integrate other forms of realtime content, that would make for an awesome user experience, and there’s no reason why that couldn’t be the quickest default search option.

  • http://www.basvandenbeld.com Bas van den Beld

    Hi Nichola, thats interesting! I’m off course checking out the differences right away. I think the issue here lies in the local-subject. A point which the specific real time search engines clearly need to work on. If I check Google.co.uk I’m not getting any real time results what so ever, I DO however get latest indexed results. But that could be because I’m not actually in the UK at the moment (have to work on that ;) ).

    If I go to search.twitter.com a few minutes ago I got 1 tweet back, so that didn’t work very good either. OneRiot didn’t give me any result whatsoever either.

    You know which did work very good though? Bing- Twitter… so the specific page Bing designed for Twitter did give me the best results. Now there’s an interesting angle.

    I think two issues are at steak here: local, which sites like Leapfish and Oneriot will need to work on and the firehose. Bing has got the deal with Twitter and with that won this ‘battle’ I think.

  • http://www.basvandenbeld.com Bas van den Beld
  • http://www.leapfish.com Lena Shaw

    Nichola,

    Bas is correct, LeapFish is currently in negotiations with Twitter to be added as a partner. The firehose partnership will give sites like LeapFish and Topsy the extra power needed to really explore that deep rich real time web. You can follow our blog http://blog.leapfish.com for updates.

    Be safe!

    Lena Shaw
    Manager, PR & Social Media

  • Shyam Kapur

    This is a good post. Next time you are curious about anything in the world – local or not – check out TipTop http://FeelTipTop.com which will give you the very latest organized in some magical ways. Enjoy!

  • http://www.themediaflow.com Nichola Stott

    @Lena

    Thanks for taking the time. I will certainly be keeping an eye on the blog. I’m really looking forward to seeing how this space develops. Particulalrly following the Reuters press release story to their staff last night. I’m sure you’ve seen it but it opens up an interesting dichotomy for traditional media: http://mashable.com/2010/03/11/reuters-social-media-policy/

0 Flares Twitter 0 Facebook 0 Google+ 0 LinkedIn 0 Buffer 0 Email 0 StumbleUpon 0 Pin It Share 0 Filament.io 0 Flares ×